[Feature] Add olymmath dataset (#1982)

* Add olymmath dataset

* Add olymmath dataset

* Add olymmath dataset

* Update olymmath dataset
This commit is contained in:
liushz 2025-04-02 17:34:07 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 97236c8e97
commit 32d6859679
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
6 changed files with 185 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -715,6 +715,12 @@
paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.02789v1
configpath: opencompass/configs/datasets/obqa/obqa_gen.py
configpath_llmjudge: ''
- olymmath:
name: OlymMATH
category: Math
paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21380
configpath: ''
configpath_llmjudge: opencompass/configs/datasets/OlymMATH/olymmath_llm_judeg_gen.py
- piqa:
name: OpenBookQA
category: Knowledge / Physics

View File

@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
# OlymMATH
[GitHub Link](https://github.com/RUCAIBox/OlymMATH)
Dataset OlymMATH, please refer to the paper:
Challenging the Boundaries of Reasoning: An Olympiad-Level Math Benchmark for Large Language Models by Haoxiang Sun, Yingqian Min, Zhipeng Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Zheng Liu, Zhongyuan Wang, Lei Fang, and Ji-Rong Wen.
## How to eval OlymMATH with model judge
This is a simple example:
```python
from opencompass.models import OpenAISDK, OpenAI
from mmengine.config import read_base
with read_base():
from opencompass.configs.models.qwen2_5.lmdeploy_qwen2_5_7b_instruct import models as qwen2_5_7b_instruct_model
from opencompass.configs.datasets.OlymMATH.olymmath_gen import olymmath_datasets
################## Judge Config ##################
api_meta_template = dict(round=[
dict(role='HUMAN', api_role='HUMAN'),
dict(role='BOT', api_role='BOT', generate=True),
], )
judge_cfg = dict(
# An API model with OpenAI API format is required for Judge
abbr='qwen2-5-32B-Instruct',
type=OpenAISDK,
path='Qwen/Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct',
key='sk-1234',
openai_api_base=[
'http://172.30.56.1:4000/v1',
],
meta_template=api_meta_template,
query_per_second=16,
batch_size=1024,
temperature=0.001,
max_completion_tokens=32768,
tokenizer_path='gpt-4o-2024-05-13',
verbose=True,
max_out_len=16384,
max_seq_len=32768,
)
################## Model Config ##################
models = [*qwen2_5_7b_instruct_model]
################## Dataset Config ##################
datasets = [*olymmath_datasets]
# Set judge_cfg for evaluation
for item in datasets:
item['infer_cfg']['inferencer']['max_out_len'] = 32768
if 'judge_cfg' in item['eval_cfg']['evaluator']:
item['eval_cfg']['evaluator']['judge_cfg'] = judge_cfg
work_dir = './outputs/olymmath_llm_eval'
```

View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
from mmengine.config import read_base
with read_base():
# Default use LLM as a judge
from .olymmath_llmverify_gen_97b203 import olymmath_datasets # noqa: F401, F403

View File

@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
from opencompass.openicl.icl_prompt_template import PromptTemplate
from opencompass.openicl.icl_retriever import ZeroRetriever
from opencompass.openicl.icl_inferencer import GenInferencer
from opencompass.evaluator import GenericLLMEvaluator
from opencompass.datasets import generic_llmjudge_postprocess
from opencompass.datasets import OlymMATHDataset
# ----------------------------- Detailed Config -----------------------------
math_reader_cfg = dict(input_columns=['problem'], output_column='answer', train_split='test')
math_infer_cfg = dict(
prompt_template=dict(
type=PromptTemplate,
template=dict(
round=[
dict(role='HUMAN', prompt='{problem}\nRemember to put your final answer within \\boxed{}.'),
]
),
),
retriever=dict(type=ZeroRetriever),
inferencer=dict(type=GenInferencer),
)
sub_sets = ['en-hard', 'zh-hard', 'en-easy', 'zh-easy']
GRADER_TEMPLATE = """
Please as a grading expert, judge whether the final answers given by the candidates below are consistent with the standard answers, that is, whether the candidates answered correctly.
Here are some evaluation criteria:
1. Please refer to the given standard answer. You don't need to re-generate the answer to the question because the standard answer has been given. You only need to judge whether the candidate's answer is consistent with the standard answer according to the form of the question. Don't try to answer the original question. You can assume that the standard answer is definitely correct.
2. Because the candidate's answer may be different from the standard answer in the form of expression, before making a judgment, please understand the question and the standard answer first, and then judge whether the candidate's answer is correct, but be careful not to try to answer the original question.
3. Some answers may contain multiple items, such as multiple-choice questions, multiple-select questions, fill-in-the-blank questions, etc. As long as the answer is the same as the standard answer, it is enough. For multiple-select questions and multiple-blank fill-in-the-blank questions, the candidate needs to answer all the corresponding options or blanks correctly to be considered correct.
4. Some answers may be expressed in different ways, such as some answers may be a mathematical expression, some answers may be a textual description, as long as the meaning expressed is the same. And some formulas are expressed in different ways, but they are equivalent and correct.
5. If the prediction is given with \\boxed{}, please ignore the \\boxed{} and only judge whether the candidate's answer is consistent with the standard answer.
Please judge whether the following answers are consistent with the standard answer based on the above criteria. Grade the predicted answer of this new question as one of:
A: CORRECT
B: INCORRECT
Just return the letters "A" or "B", with no text around it.
Here is your task. Simply reply with either CORRECT, INCORRECT. Don't apologize or correct yourself if there was a mistake; we are just trying to grade the answer.
<Original Question Begin>: \n{problem}\n<Original Question End>\n\n
<Gold Target Begin>: \n{answer}\n<Gold Target End>\n\n
<Predicted Answer Begin>: \n{prediction}\n<Predicted End>\n\n
Judging the correctness of candidates' answers:
""".strip()
# Evaluation configuration
olymmath_datasets = []
for sub_set in sub_sets:
math_eval_cfg = dict(
evaluator=dict(
type=GenericLLMEvaluator,
prompt_template=dict(
type=PromptTemplate,
template=dict(
begin=[
dict(
role='SYSTEM',
fallback_role='HUMAN',
prompt="You are a helpful assistant who evaluates the correctness and quality of models' outputs.")
],
round=[
dict(
role='HUMAN',
prompt = GRADER_TEMPLATE
),
]),
),
dataset_cfg=dict(
type=OlymMATHDataset,
path='RUC-AIBOX/OlymMATH',
reader_cfg=math_reader_cfg,
subset=sub_set,
),
judge_cfg=dict(),
dict_postprocessor=dict(type=generic_llmjudge_postprocess),
),
pred_role='BOT',
)
olymmath_datasets.append(
dict(
type=OlymMATHDataset,
abbr=f'olymmath_llmjudge_{sub_set}',
path='RUC-AIBOX/OlymMATH',
reader_cfg=math_reader_cfg,
infer_cfg=math_infer_cfg,
eval_cfg=math_eval_cfg,
subset=sub_set,
)
)

View File

@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ from .natural_question import * # noqa: F401, F403
from .natural_question_cn import * # noqa: F401, F403
from .NPHardEval import * # noqa: F401, F403
from .obqa import * # noqa: F401, F403
from .olymmath import * # noqa: F401, F403
from .OlympiadBench import * # noqa: F401, F403
from .OpenFinData import * # noqa: F401, F403
from .piqa import * # noqa: F401, F403

View File

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
from datasets import load_dataset
from opencompass.registry import LOAD_DATASET
from .base import BaseDataset
@LOAD_DATASET.register_module()
class OlymMATHDataset(BaseDataset):
@staticmethod
def load(path: str, subset: str):
dataset = load_dataset(path, subset)
return dataset